Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POISONOUS HONEY

H. F. M M Matata, writes to the 1f.55. Journal of Agriculture a3 folfollows :—I would liice to Know if there are many flowers which yield poisonous honey, Rangiora scrub is abundant here, but I believe that in its case the poison evaporates. However, there are said to be other-plants much worse in their action, and I have heard a small yellow Rwauap> flower blamed, but do not Know if this is correct. Therp have been several cases of severe poisoning in the district, one at Wairaana being fatal, and the advice usually given is, '• Do not touch wild honey." But there cannot be any difference between wild aud apiary honey where scrub (not bush) is so abundant. Some say that if the honey is sealed it is safe, while others disagree. Can you give me any definite information ? The Horticulture Division :—What is presumed to be the most common plant frotr which poisonous honey ia gathered is Brachyglottis repanda — commonly called (but wrongly so) "rangiora." This plant is rightly " Wharangi-Tawhito" ; it is common in northern districts. Brachyglottis rangiora is common in the northe7*n portion of the North Island; it is also found in the South Island, and is correctly and commonly called " rangiora." They are of the same family, but rangiora is certainly the more handsome plant. Ranunculus rivnlaris, commonly called "whoriki," is a swamp-buttercup with a yellow flower, and this rolant also yields n poibonous nectar in the flowering season. It is gratifying to know, however, that all the poisoning cases which JJhave been investigated have been due to eating the honey in the spring before it has bsen riuened bjthe bees, and no cases have been known when only vipo or capped honey has been used. This would naturally suggest that the poison is volatile, and is evaporated by the bees before the cappings of wax are placed in a position to seal the cells. So far as the honey produced by commercial bookkeepers in the districts affected is concerned, there is no danger whatever, as the produco is not extracted from the comb until the cells are sealed, aud private owners need not be afraid as long as they take the same precautions.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KWE19201209.2.19.1

Bibliographic details

Kaipara and Waitemata Echo, 9 December 1920, Page 4

Word Count
369

POISONOUS HONEY Kaipara and Waitemata Echo, 9 December 1920, Page 4

POISONOUS HONEY Kaipara and Waitemata Echo, 9 December 1920, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert