Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Kaiwaka Compensation Case.

TO BE HEARD BY SUPREME COURT

The compensation case, Robert Eos s versus the Minister of Public Works claim for £897 2s 8d for some 35 acres of lann appropriated by the Government for Railway purposes at Kaiwaka was again under the notice of Mr Justice Cooper in Auckland last Thursday, tne judge sitting as President of the Compensation Court. Mr Me Grregor appeared for the claimant and Mr Shera for the respondent. The poiut to be decided was whether the question of law should be argued before the judge (as President of Compensation Court) or whether the Judge sitting as President of tho Compensation Court, should state a case for the Supreme Court. Mr Shera remarked that in regard to his Honour's previous suggestion that the case should be heard dy the Court of Appeal, he had received a telegram from the Department, stating that the Crown Law Officers had been advised not to pay the cost accruing from taking the case to the full Court.

His Honour stated that there would be no appeal from any decision the Supreme Court might come to in the matter. He would like the case to go to the Appeal Court, but there was no machinery for carrying this method into effect. The case raised a very important point as to whether, under the Public Works Act the Court was called upon to set-off against any loss or damages the claimant had suffered by,the construction of the railway, the amount of the betterment of the property due to the construction of the railway, seeing that such increase affected all the land in the district and not claimants property alone.

With th« consent of counsel his Honour decided to draw up a case for hearing by the Supreme Court.

The Compensation Court was then adjourned until March 6th.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KWE19130212.2.17

Bibliographic details

Kaipara and Waitemata Echo, 12 February 1913, Page 3

Word Count
308

Kaiwaka Compensation Case. Kaipara and Waitemata Echo, 12 February 1913, Page 3

Kaiwaka Compensation Case. Kaipara and Waitemata Echo, 12 February 1913, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert