Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRESPONDENCE.

THE BREWERS LITERATURE.

XO THE EDITOR. Sir, —In Saturday's mail apparently every elector in Ihe Kaipara received a budget of literature from the brewers, which, calls for a deckled protest from every fair-minded person, a protest not against the distribution of literature through the mail but a protest against the distribution of inaccuracies, not to use a stronger •worti. I refer to the cartoon about Maine and the reference to Waihi on the card "Facts which should influence youv vote. " I have no hesitation in speak ~ ing plainly, when I say that the cartoon about Maine, reprinted from the N.Z. Observer of Uctober' 14th*, is being issued by the brewers who knows well the facts it contains are false, and have been refuted by the information which came by cable and appeared in The Dress colums of N.Z. Herald November 9th. Prior to that a cable had been received by both novticense and liquor parties to the effect that the Governor of the State of Maine had declared a majority of 748 agaicst them. Now in the face of this reliable information they issue a cartoon which i they know to be untrue and -which stands condemned in its own light. Then again, the use that the brewers have made of the statutory declaration oftheMavorof Waihi of the 17th. Uctober, 1911, that Waihi had received neither moral or material benefit from no-license. Why Jo the liquor party print a statement of an individual when they know that statement has been contradicted by six ot the councillors of the borough _of Waihi. I refer to the Council meeting reported in the N.Z. Herald, Nov. 4th, when Mr Saunders moved that the opinion of the Mayor regarding Waihi under no-license does not represent the opinion of the Council and this Council considers that no-license in Waihi has not had an injurious eftect, either financially, morally or socially on the well-being of the town, but that the town had benefited morally and socially by the change ; seconded by Mr McCarthy and carried by six votes to three. Which statement think you is of greater worth, suroly on democratic principles the opinion of six is worth moro than that of three. In conclusion. lean admire fair argument on auy question, but I object to unfa'-r use of statements that are not true aad I believe that the- electors of the Kaipara will judge fairly on all statements made between this and the poll.—l am, etc, 11. PAG E, Secretary Kaipara No-Liceuse League.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KWE19111129.2.21

Bibliographic details

Kaipara and Waitemata Echo, 29 November 1911, Page 4

Word Count
419

CORRESPONDENCE. Kaipara and Waitemata Echo, 29 November 1911, Page 4

CORRESPONDENCE. Kaipara and Waitemata Echo, 29 November 1911, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert