MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Kaipara and Waitemata Echo, 4 October 1911, Page 3

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

MONDAY, OCTOBER,. 2nd, 1911, (Before E/V, Eraser, Esq., 5.M.),! . POLICE OASeS. Police, v. • Dannis Tracey, charged with a breach, of a. Prohibition order. .'-, Defendant did not appear. Case ad- " journed sini die, ■ .•• \ -=:-•■••■•• "■■--;:• , Police v, 'J. E. Browne, charged ■With, procuring liquor for a prohibited person. Charge dismissedPolice v.-W. J« Fulton,, 'breach,.o-t prohibition order, :fined |2 and 18s Costs, in default-14 days imprisonnaeiit. Police v. 0:-Sandin and- Benjamin Copeflo, charged with fighting on the vharl, convicted arid ordered to pay • 12s costs each. . ; . .. ; - \ CHARGES UNDER THE FACTORIES ACT AXD -' AWARDS. ; ■.■-•■ Inspector of-Factories (Mr E. W. E, Gohns) v. Stewart Bros. Ltd., charged . " with woiking employees .'extended hours without & permit. Defendant pleaded. Convicted guilty and ordered to pay costs£s. : ' Mr J. A- Beale appeared for thedeiendatH.. .;; . Same v. Stewart Bros, failing to pay overtime rates on first regular pay 'day.' Convicted and: ordered to pay 9s costs. Same v. Stewart. Bros, faumg to keep overtime book, convicted and fined £ land 9s costs. .--, : Same v, E, Hunter, charged with failing to keep an overtime book. Defendant pleaded guilty. Convicted and ordered to pay 9a costs. Similar cases against Messrs: McEwin,. Smith, and Langley of the local hotels, who also pleaded guilty, were similarly dealtwith. !, ..CIVIL..CASES.- . •;< ::- Several Maori cases in which Stewart Bros, were the plaintiffs, were nonsuited with costs £3 3s. Mr J. A. Beala appeared for the plaintiffs, and Mr W. ' E. Hackett for the defendants. Simcock v. Laßoehe—Claim £3-10/8 J. A. Beale for plaintiff; the defendant conducted his own case. After a . considerable amount of evidence had ■been taken on both sides, judgment was given for plaintiff for 21s with costs £2 165,: if good? in dispute were returned, 12s to bo deducted. J. McLGod v. .T. 0. Gardner-r-Claim £jO 14s 4d. Judgment for plaintiff hy default 'with costs £3. M. Norton t. Perkins, claim 17s 6d. Judgment for plaintiff by consent with costs 17s. Perkins v. M. Norton (J. A. Beale) claim 15s; nonsuited with costs 18s 9s to defendantInspector of Factories v. H, Coulter claim £10 for breach of the Auckland i TailoressbS Award, eniployingtwo ap'"X prentices without first employing four lourneyworaen as required by terms . of the said award. Judgment was given plaintiff by default for £2 with costs 2s. , : I. McLeod v. B. Needham, claim £4 6s Id. Judgment by default with costs ss. - A number of cases were struck out through non-appearance of either .„, parties. v •' • ■ •-' * ■ ' ■I*-'-- • " ~ JUDGMENT CASES. ': Hwdy (J, A. Beaie) v. J. Ban, ■'■■- claim £7 10s 6d, ordered to pay £8 15j forthwith, in default 8 days imprison-T-'inent. ■ irx;y, :--/' 'i >: •.■.-. v. ■■; •■■'^• r Stewart Bros. v. Benaett, claim £2c •lbs 6d, ordered to pay £12 16s 6c forthwith, in default 12 days impris^ - onmeti Warrant to bo suspendec ; ; • as long as £4 per month was paid ir jeiuction. " : ■ Lyons v. Whitika, claim £6 13s 6d ©Tderedtopay £7 12s, in default 't *la vs. imprisonment. ■'■'•* -■.. Stewart Bros. (J. A. Beale) y; Dickman, claim £5 8& Bd. Ordered to pa} £5 16s 8d in defaults day« imprisun, jnent; warrant to be suspended so lodj as £1 was paid in reduction. Hand v. Conway, claim £5 Os 6d -o-ndered to pay £6 16s 6d in defaul '6 d«iys impusonment. Meinhold v. Osborne, claim £.14 3s no order made. Why. suffer with cough and cold whei you can cure same by taking Tonking'j Linseed Emulsion. From all chemist: rf»nd stores. Is6d, 2sH 4s 6a,