Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE WATER DISPUTE.

[to the editor.] Sir—lf I thought my late communication to your paper was as unintelligible to the community generally as it seems to have been to your correspondent “ Outsider,” I don’t think I would ever commit such a sin again. He says I rubbed it in pretty hot to Mr Gow, and that it was to no purpose, as I had not shown a remedy for shortness of water and chronic growling. The remedy for shortness of water is entirely in the hands of the Government, and is being carried out as quickly as the circumstances will permit, and as for chronic growling I think I showed that everybody seemed satisfied to wait the course of events till the gauges were interfered with. As for the manager’s I’igbt of interference, no sensible man will dispute; but this' much I say, that the time was inopportune and ill-advised, as our difficulties in opening the claims, shortness of water, and whatnot, are almost too much for us already ; and I still maintain that Mr Gow has a right to satisfy the miners, or try to, that his alteration to gauge-boxes will supply the regulation head. There can be no doubt about the result of the alterations, viz., a rise in the price of water; and I maintain that all the circumstances of the case would lead us to expect quite a contrary result. There is not a claim connected with the channel that has paid wages yet, and, in spite of the high expectations for the future, some of them never will. If I understand Mr Gow’s character, which I think I do, I don’t think he would object to the fair criticism that his public position renders him liable to. “Outsider” may rest assured that his championship of Mr Gow is quite unnecessary. As a public officer and as an individual Mr Gow is well enough known and respected to be free from much harm from the occasional sweeping denunciation that is to be met with, as the source is pretty well known, and consequently although high-sounding, falls harmless. I disavow any intention of injuring Mr Gow, or anyone else, but the right to fair criticism shall always be maintained by the Cove up the Lead. April 30, 1883.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KUMAT18830501.2.8.1

Bibliographic details

Kumara Times, Issue 2081, 1 May 1883, Page 2

Word Count
381

THE WATER DISPUTE. Kumara Times, Issue 2081, 1 May 1883, Page 2

THE WATER DISPUTE. Kumara Times, Issue 2081, 1 May 1883, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert