SALE OF A WIFE IN WELLINGTON.
(Evening Post) The moral and material obligations of matrimony are bat imperfectly understood among certain classes, even in this, the nineteenth century. An exceedingly striking illustration of the fact has been afforded by recent disclosures arising out of proceedings in the Resident Magistrate’s Court. About a year ago, a man named George Nash was convicted of larceny under peculiar circumstances and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment. It seemed that he and a Mrs Macpherson elopsd to Christchurch, the latter taking with her some L2O in money, a watch, and other articles, the property of her lawful husband. The money was speedily spent, and Nash then abandoned his paramour, as a last act taking the watch and pawning it in order to obtain means to obtain a passage back to Wellington. Subsequently proceedings were instituted. Mrs Macpherson gave evidence against him, and he was found guilty of feloniously appropriating the watch. After the trial the husband and wife made up matters and lived together again, but owing to some cause or other the reunion did not prove a happy one. So tired of each other’s society did they become, that by mutual consent Macpherson sold his fair but frail spouse to a man named Winnie, the purchase money being fixed at 10s 6d. A formal agreement was drawn up between the parties, husband, wife, and purchaser, all signing it, and two witnesses in addition appending their signatures to the precious document. The transfer of the “property ” followed immediately, and so far the transaction was closed. Mr Winnie, however, after a few weeks’ possession, wearied of his bargain, and eventually declined to be burdened with it any longer, on which the deserted one went back to her husband, and, on his objecting to maintain, sued him in the Resident Magistrate’s Court for maintenance, at the same time asking for a protection order. Tne case was to be heard yesterday, but through other business it could not be called on till late in the afternoon, when there was no appear- . mice of either party, and it was dismissed. The reason for this was that the pair, getting tired of waiting for Mr Davy’s decision, sought out Mr Mansford in his private room, and he with his usual kindness, not being aware of all the facts, endeavored to make peace between them. The first thing the husband did was to .place before Mr Mansford a printed report of the trial of Nash, containing the story of the wife’s elopment, on which the woman took a pooketbook from her bosom containing the sale-note, duly signed, as above stated This so astounded the worthy R.M. that, after examining it, he informed the disputants that both were a disgrace to society, and dismissed them in a premptory manner. The consequence was, that they did not trouble the sitting Magistrate, and the case, on being called, was dismissed, as above stated. This is not the first occasion on which a wife has been bought and sold in Wellington—a similar transaction having been brought to light in the R.M. Court about a year ago. The whole affair certainly, as Mr Mansford pointed out', is altogether of the most disgraceful character.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KUMAT18800611.2.12
Bibliographic details
Kumara Times, Issue 1155, 11 June 1880, Page 4
Word Count
539SALE OF A WIFE IN WELLINGTON. Kumara Times, Issue 1155, 11 June 1880, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.