Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AWAKINO COUNTY.

To the Editor. Sir,—l am pleased to see that the majority of councillors of the above county decided not to agree to the cutting off of the Mahoenui district to go into Waitomo County. Their decision for the time being i 3 wise, and to ray mind the cutting lip of the eouuty should not be allowed until the whole of the eastern side of the North riding take steps in t'ne matter, when, no doubt tho whole of the eastern side, including Te Anga, Man gaohae,Pomorangi, Kiritehere, Waitanguru, Mangaotald, an<? Mahoenui will decide to at Eorne future date; and as a matter of fact I see no reason why the Murakopa settlers should not be included. At present a petition is going the rounds with the object of inducing settlers there, and in the Kiriteheie to join forces with the Kawhia County. I trust that the Council will aIGO deal with the petition when it comes along with an obstinate refusal, and thereby not allow a handful of settlers to dominate the whole of the County. If the County is cut up there will be little doubt but it could be done on a more equitable basij than that proposed, and with a little more sense of reasonableness as regards the community of interest of ratepayers. Cutting off slices must not be tolerated. It must be ?. decision of the whole or not at all. It ;3 really regrettable what soma paopie will resort to in their attempt to coerce the n ajority, and the amateurish idea of handling figures ia highly amusing. One advocate in urging on a settler who declined to favour the proposal of Kawhia, and was considering trie Waitomo Council th« proper body to merge with, was informed that ha—ha advocate—had been supplied with reliable figures as regards the comparative cost of administration in the two counties, which ha said was £IOO a year for Kawhia, and not a penny less than £BOO a year in Waitomo. Other innuendoes have been set in motion, ani it is really surprising where they emanate from. However, they are like the figures: absolute rubbish —I am, etc., RATEPAYER.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KCC19140401.2.19.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

King Country Chronicle, Volume VIII, Issue 656, 1 April 1914, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
361

AWAKINO COUNTY. King Country Chronicle, Volume VIII, Issue 656, 1 April 1914, Page 5

AWAKINO COUNTY. King Country Chronicle, Volume VIII, Issue 656, 1 April 1914, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert