Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CRITICISING A COMPANY.

ACTION FOR DEFAMATION. PLAINTIFF NON-SUITED. [BY TELEGBAPH. —PRESS ASSOCIATION.] Auckland, This Day. In the action brought by the Northern Wairoa Dairy Company against Wm. Thomas Hunt, a farmer, claiming £IOO damages for alleged 'defamation, the plaintiff company was non-suited, with costs on the lowest scale, but Judgej|Copoer'said there was no evidence before the court, and no suggestion by either counsel or witnesses that the company had acted with any impropriety in the financial management of its affairs.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KCC19140214.2.38

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

King Country Chronicle, Volume VIII, Issue 643, 14 February 1914, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
80

CRITICISING A COMPANY. King Country Chronicle, Volume VIII, Issue 643, 14 February 1914, Page 5

CRITICISING A COMPANY. King Country Chronicle, Volume VIII, Issue 643, 14 February 1914, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert