Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TWO KINDS OF UNIONISM

A craft or trade union at best is

simply an association of wage workers formed for the purpose of gaining improved conditions as wage workers. While originally intended to unite, craft unionism actually keeps the workers divided. To take that much-quoted example, the Building Industry, we find a multiplicity of unions—carpenters’, plumbers’, scaffolders’, bricklayers’, iron workers’, etc,, etc., and various subdivisions. Or-

ganised as they are, in separate groups, they tie themselves up with separate agreements, thus making common action by the Building workers, as an industry, impossible. Craft Unionism is bad enough in countries where the strike is the recognised weapon, but here we have the added evil of an Arbitration system which, by encouraging dependence on officials, etc., saps the virility of the whole Labour movement because it develops docility in the rank and file. Compromise, which is encouraged under Arbitration, is the craft union official’s god. Many officials, recognising that an easier and steadier job is assured, and fearing to face a struggle, encourage Arbitration.

Craft unionism is out of date—a thing of the past. To be governed by craft union rules, methods and ideals is to be governed by the dead. It fails to keep pace with industrial development, and the longer it lasts the more impotent and hopeless it becomes. Its motto —‘ A fair day’s wage ’ ’ —is a recognition of the employers’ right to exploit labour. Contrast this with the New Unionism, which boldly declares for the whole product of labour for the labourer; groups the workers into industries instead of crafts; combines the industries into One Big Class Union; recognises that

an injury to one is an injury to all, and adopts up-to-date methods of warfare, and aims at ending the present insane social system by establishing an Industrial Commonwealth.—W.M.

The interests of the working class can be upheld only by an organisation formed in such a way that all its members in any one industry, or in all industries if necessary, cease work when = ever a strike or lockout is on in any department thereof, thus making an injury to one an in = jury to all.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/INDU19130701.2.19

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Industrial Unionist, Volume 1, Issue 6, 1 July 1913, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
357

TWO KINDS OF UNIONISM Industrial Unionist, Volume 1, Issue 6, 1 July 1913, Page 3

TWO KINDS OF UNIONISM Industrial Unionist, Volume 1, Issue 6, 1 July 1913, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert