Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RETIRING AGES.

SIXTY YEARS OLD TOO YOUNG.

AN AMERICAN SUMMARY.

The Literary Digest (New York) summarises a, ll interesting discussion now going on in the 1 Amwicam press on the proper retiring age:—

Sixty years is too young—6s or 70 is a better age limit— accordingto President Coolidge, for allowing Government employees to retire from service and to become pensioners; consequently sponsors of Bills before Congress to liberalise the present system have raised their minimum to 62 for optional retirement, with graduations to 65 and beyond. This at once raises, the; question of when to retire, not merely from Government Civil Service, but from active duties in business and the professions. Most editors 1 apparently ta,ke pleasure in marshalling examples of successful careers beyond 60 and beyond the Biblical three score and ,ten. “Thiel truth is that men now know how to live, more sensibly, and longer, than they formerly did,” declares the Cincinnati Enquirer ; “it may not be possible arbitrarily to fix the age of ‘retirement,’ but it certainly is not 60 1 .” The Seattle Timesv in similar vein, remarks : “Men live in the open, live easily, Hve carefully, and extend the measure of their days. Need one add that tjie same is true of the other sex ? Fair, fat, and forty is no modern ideak The woman of 40 is likely to be mistaken for tlie sister of her eldest daughter. Released from the grinding drudgery of the home, she keeps young by maintaining an alert mind and a keen interest in the current events of the very interesting age hi which she lives.” We read in the Boston Herald : “It is regrettable that this matter must be handled anywhere arbitrarily. Many people are plenty old enough to retire at 60 ; others are perfectly efficient at 80 and beyond. It all depends. It is bad for the world to lose valuable services merely because of an arbitrary age. limit. It lessens the net product of human activities, as well as the usefulness, and so the happiness of a great many individuals.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HPGAZ19260920.2.20

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXVII, Issue 5029, 20 September 1926, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
343

RETIRING AGES. Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXVII, Issue 5029, 20 September 1926, Page 4

RETIRING AGES. Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXVII, Issue 5029, 20 September 1926, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert