Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CRICKET.

MATCHES ON THE PLAINS.

THAMES TEAMS DEFEATED.

On Saturday ’two matches were ,played between Thames and .Plains teams, .and the result was a double victory for the Plaine representatives. There- can be little doubt that the Thames teams were not at home, on the concrete wickets, • and the outfields, as, available on the Plains, are not calculated ,to give a batsman an opportunity to display his uSiuali foim,. even to play good cricket. This is a matter that requires very serious, attention by the Plains association if it is the wish for cricket toi improve. It is better to have one good central ground than a number of inferior grounds scattered over the district. In the “A” -game the home , team batted first, and McDonald, Green, and Macklow were the chief contributors to the total'. Woodbridge was unlucky in being caught behind the sticks early. The Thames wicketkeeper gave a fine exhibition, and short runs were at a premium. The bowling by ■ the visitors, with the exception of Buchan, was not difficult. Buchan kept an excellent length, and had a good action in delivery. Thames did not show any convincing command over the Plainsi bowling, but the pace off the wicket was probably the reason for this: Gibson has a good variety of off strokes, his square, cutting beihg very convincing.

At Pipiroa the “B” match w,as a (succession of surprises), and at one stage 1 the Plains team had six wickets down for 5 runs. A good recovery was made by Stretton and McPherspm and this saved ithe game for the •Plains. Gordon and McLeary were the best of the Thames bowlers. O’Neil brought disaster to the Thames- batting, his average being five wickets for three runs.

The return, matches.;will be interesting; as the Plains' representatives will then have an oppoitunity of gauging .their strength on the, turf wicket. ' .' Following are the details of the games.:— ' ; " - HAURAKI PLAINS. “A.” A; McDonald, st., b Brokenshire 58 iF. Woodbridge,. c Twentymanrb Gibson—- —. . 7 T. Mackay, c Rickit- b Brokenshire 16 R. Green, b Shepherd 28 'R. Whelan, b Rickit - 7 F, Stockwell, c Gibson, b Broken- ' ’ shire ! t ——— 5 R. Mackloiw, hot out . 30 B. Johnston, c Buchan, b Broken-? shire ——‘ t 0 A. Otter, c and b Brokenshire — 0 G. Boyd, b Dare —l4 R. > b Buchan ' A Extras, 10 ' : Total 176 Bowling Analysis,.—Gibson, 1 .for 23 ; Buchan, 1 for 6 ; Shepherd, 1 for ■3B; Brokenshire, 5 for 70 Dare, 1 for 12 ; Mortimer, 0 for 7 ; Rickit, 1 for 10. - THAMES “A..”' E. Rickit, b Canning 15 A‘. Dobson, run out 6 E. Smith, not out 9 G.Twantyman, c Whelan, b MeDonald'—- 1 A. Shepherd, c Otter, b McDonald 1 Brokenshire, Lb.w./b Whelan — 27 F. Gibson, c McDonald, b Canning 0 G. Buchan, b Canning ———-— 3 M. Dare, c .and b Canning ——- ? -R. Buchan, Lb.w., b McDonald — 1 Mortimer, c Johnston, b 'Canning 6 Extras-— : ___u_—.—.2 z- ■ Total . . 85 Bowling Analysis.—Canning, 5 for 5'5 ; McDonald, 3 for 18 ; Macldpw, 0 for 9; Whelan, 1 for 1. . PLAINS “B!—First Innings, C. Clarke, b McLea,ry—o N. Hedges, c and, b Gordon—■_ 0 W. O’Neil, b Gordon _! 1 G. Dare.b McLeary 2 G. Griffiths', b McLeary_____■— •! C. Stretton, Lb.w* Hoyle-- .1U Prince, b Gordon — fl, ’A; MacPherson, Lb.w. Dare .13 E. Gi11,., c Hoyle, b Connorsl J. Galvin, not out -—— 4 S. Phillips, c Dodd, b Gordon 4 .' Extras, ' , ,1 9 Total,, % 59' Bowling Analysis.—Gordon 4 for H, McLeary 3 for 7, Dare 1 fob 11, .Connors 1 for 18, Hoyle, ! 1 for 3. THAMES “B.”—First Innings!, Twentyman, run out —-—- '4 Hoyle, b Ma,cPhersdnL .0 Dare, run out —.— I*- 3 Dodd, c Griffiths, b -McPherson ' Gleeson, played. on, b O’Neil —— s'| Houghton, b McPhenson 1 Connors, b lO’Neil —1 Gordon, b O’Neil 1 Wayne, not out •'■___.* 2 Cleave, b O’Neil - 0 McCleary, b O’Neil—,._ 4 Extras •— 9 \. ' — . ' Total 44 Bowling Analysis.—O’Neil, '5 for 3 ; Clarke/ O.for-5; Gill, 0 for 10; Prince, 0 for 3 ; McPherson. 3 for 14. PLAINS “B”—Second Innings. W. O’Neil, c. Dare, ,b Gordon 2 C. Clarke, e Houghton, b Gordon 1 N. Hedges, played or?, b Gleeson 0 G. Dare, b Gordon 7 G. L. Griffiths', c Cleave, b Glordon 11 C. Stretton, c Dodd, b Gleeigon — 1 Prince, c Dodd, b Gordon 4 A. McPherson, not out '— 18 E. Gill, c McLeary, b Dare 1 J. Galvin, not out 7 Extras 4 Tota.l for 8 wickets ,S 6 Bowling Analysis.—Gordon, 5 for 22 ; McLeary, 0 for 11; Oleeison, 2 Tor 5 ; Dare, 1 for 7 ; Conno rs, 0 for 7.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HPGAZ19260224.2.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXVII, Issue 4943, 24 February 1926, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
764

CRICKET. Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXVII, Issue 4943, 24 February 1926, Page 1

CRICKET. Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXVII, Issue 4943, 24 February 1926, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert