Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THAMES HARBOUR.

THE SCHEME CRITICISED. OPINION AT NETHERTON. “ WONDERFUL PLACE, THAMES !” The Thames Harbour Scheme was criticised at a meeting of; the Nether,ton Ratepayers’ Association on Saturday evening. Mr J. A. Reid said they were all interested in the Thames Harbour Scheme, and asked Mr A. Chatfield (Hauraki. Plains county councillor), who was present, to what extent they would benefit.

Mr Chatfield said the Council had wished the Harbour rate to be %d and a commission had fixed It. at %d. Some of the councillors were in favour of; the Harbour scheme, but not all of them. Harbour matters had not. been discussed in council, Mr Reid asked for Mr Chatfield’s oWn views on the Thames Harbour Scheme.

Mr Chatfield said a booklet had been printed in connection with the scheme, and the bluing was very nicely got up. Personally he would vote against the scheme. He may change his views in a few years’ time. It

was a few years top soon. Comparisons could not be drawn with the Gisborne Harbour. A harbour scheme was the best way of dropping sovereigns down a sink. Mr Harms ’said the mudbanks at Thames were always shifting. Thames would never have .a harbour,. No sooner was it made than it would silt up again. Mr H. Hare said they could do without the Thames Harbour and the Kirikiri bridge. The railway would be a benefit to them. The Thames had a big idea of what a wonderful place Thames was—big boats sailing in and picking up produce. If the Thames Harbour Scheme was' got going they would have to build freezing works and suc,h like.

Mr R. H. Heappey said it took a boat six or seven weeks to get out from Home and eight or ten weeks to load at the New Zealand ports. If a boat went only to Auckland it could do more trips in a year. The curse to. New Zealand shipping was g'oing round all the small ports. Auckland should be the main port for the Hauraki Plains. The canals being, put in on the Plains could be utilised. Older countries were spending a lot of money on waterways. Here they were wasting money on railways'. Ngatea could be made a centre for the Plains, and goods could be delivered along the canals and waterways. A Voice: How about the Thames middleman ?

Mr Reid said when the matter of high freights came before the House Mr Massey had remarked on the loss of time boats had going round all the small ports, and ye.t Thames was trying to get a harbour. It was ridiculous trying to build a port within 4.0 miles of Auckland, which had all the up-to d.ate equipments.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HPGAZ19221108.2.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXIII, Issue 4489, 8 November 1922, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
454

THAMES HARBOUR. Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXIII, Issue 4489, 8 November 1922, Page 1

THAMES HARBOUR. Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXIII, Issue 4489, 8 November 1922, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert