Corespondence.

Huntly Press and District Gazette, Volume 66, Issue 66, 9 January 1914, Page 3

Corespondence.

1 ' e While it is our endeavour to give . correspondents every facility for s the free expression of their e opinion, it should be borne in 7 mind that the views expressed do :1 not, necessarily, reflect tho e opinions of the Editor. TO THE EDITOR. h ‘ 1, e SIR —Having read the letter |, of “ A Distracted Woman ”in n your last issue I would be very thankful ic you will allow me to e ask her If her husband had d been a victimised man would she n have thought it a just thing for || his fellow-workers to let it pass by without a word or action of >- any kind ? If the workers never e stick up for what is right she _ would soon find things going z. back to slavery, and then she ,t would have no chance to see her e children or husband to get on her d nerves, and I am sure there is -s nothing womanlike about striker ing with pokers. Perhaps it IIS would be a good tiling if a few s “ Distracted Women ’ had to lie c- bread-winners for a while ; they ie would then know the need ioi o solidarity, and the right to have h their rights. L hold with the strikers and hope they win as any striker’s wife should do. I am etc., A STRIKER’S WIFE ;d ;e [TO RACQUET : -Your letter rc n ceived. It has followed the wak< n of its predecessor into tin rubbish heap. The publication o 3- your epistle (Save the mark ! ie with tho name attached wouh ie form the sweetest revenge imagin g, able ; for, my unknown eorrespon le dent, your English is vile; you y, sense of fair-play, nil; and you: it abuse, the vitriol that indicates a: r- empty pato and a min. l a ip wholesome as a piece of putric *d shark. —Ed. PRESS.] k, ;d Your local draper stocks tin li syln Writing Pads at 6d am each. —Advt.