Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NO REDUCTION

LOCAL BODIES INTEREST ON BONDS DOMICILED OVERSEAS WELLINGTON, November 22. Special existing securities of New Zealand local authorities disposed of in London prior to July 1 last are, so long as the oversea domicile, is preserved, to be exempt from the statutory 20 per cent, interest reduction, and they will not be liable to conversion under exist, ing legislation. Provision along these lines in redemption of a promise given to London interests is contained in a Government Bill read a first time in the House to-night. The measure, however, doe s not in any way deal with payment of interest on London loans in New Zealand currency or sterling. In the first place the Bill extends the definition of. the term “securities” to include mortgages of land and other charges executed before April 1 as security for local body loans, and then proceeds to provide the exemptions referred to. According to the, description given conversion will not apply to existing securities (interest on which is payable outside New Zealand) which expressly or by implication confer on the holders the option to receive payment in New Zealand or the United Kingdom, and which were either issued in the United Kingdom or issued elsewhere and acquired by the holder outside the Dominion as a result of a sale effected in the United Kingdom on or before July 1 last. If a dispute crises as to whether a security was issued in the United Kingdom or acquired outside New Zealand as an outcome of a United Kingdom sale on or before July 1 the final dr*'"’'" l !nation is to rest with the Finance Minister.

“But you must look after the other follow,” said Mr parry (Auckland Central). when Mr Coates intimated that the Bill made no provision for local purchasers. Mr Coates: The good name of New Zealand must he maintained overseas. Other Labour members took the line that Parliament should not now be asked to protect any who had speculated in exchange. The Bill was read a first time.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19331124.2.40

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 24 November 1933, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
340

NO REDUCTION Hokitika Guardian, 24 November 1933, Page 5

NO REDUCTION Hokitika Guardian, 24 November 1933, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert