THE CASE OF MR SHACKLOCK
In a Press Association message Horn Christchurch, dated the 21st inst., it was stated that Francis Oakleigh Shaddock was charged with using insulting language and disturbing a public meeting. The report went oil to s"ay the Magistrate convicted, defendant and ordered him to pay costs. At the close of the telegraphed message it . was stated that “a second charge of having used insulting language was dismissed.”
Mr Shaddock writes tri make it clear that lie was -not -convicted of using illsuiting language to Mr Coates, and States sonie damage lias been done to his- reputation by the publication of such a statement. .. .. „ :j . ""'The "teTegfam - was "published by" the' “Guardian” in good faith and without : intending;; to;; Teflc-cl jnecially ’".on Mr Shaddock, or do him any harm. ■ If any wrong impression has been drawn from tlie wording- of the message, we are glad to make this explanation so that Mr Shaddock will be exonerated entirely from any adverse reflection, and that it is clear his reputation should not.be affected.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19330928.2.70
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 28 September 1933, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
174THE CASE OF MR SHACKLOCK Hokitika Guardian, 28 September 1933, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in