Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRESPONDENCE

WATER SUPPLY FEES

(To tlie Editor)

Sir. —Does history repeat itself? During the reign of Queen Anne a tax wvs 'imposed on glass windows, and now Or. King wishes to impose an 1 extr,a/ordinary water fee on septic tanks. Both impositions being directed against, appliances essential to the health aiid comfort of' the people arc equally ridiculous and iniquitous.

What i s .the matter with our councillor ? Does he not realise that in communities where no proper drainage system exists septic tanks are supremely necessary, and their use should- be encouraged.

But perhaps our worthy friend has become s o used to the noise of the iron shod tumbrils of the night that he dreads the time when the creaking and groaning of their wheels as they cumbrously move along our stony streets shall -cease. If these are the “wheels of industry” it is an-industry that requires replacement by a more modern method, and the .only; feasible, alternative i,s the septic tank ; rather than discourage our. councillors should grant every , facility for their erection. Regarding the further propos-al by the same councillor to impose an extra wate r fee on hotels and,'large boardinghouses, again. I ask, why ? Does he wish to restrict the use of. water? Surely there is plenty available on the ■West. Coast. Is the., time) coming when citizens will be restricted in* fhe;r ordinary ablutions?- I wonder what will be. the definition of -a large boarding house—a large building; or a large household If the latter definition, he may find, that some- private ' households may exceed the boarding; house in numbers, ■ and would he . therefore tax. the private -household? Sii - , -It is a common remark, “a s dead as. Queen Anne,” and I trust that after Cr. King’s proposals come up for discussion the spine -remark can aptly bo applied to them. I am, etc.. PROGRESS. Hokitika, September 13.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19330913.2.72

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 13 September 1933, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
313

CORRESPONDENCE Hokitika Guardian, 13 September 1933, Page 6

CORRESPONDENCE Hokitika Guardian, 13 September 1933, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert