Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BUTTER QUOTA

OPINION' OF DAIRY BOARD

THE SITUATION IN AUSTRALIA 'AND© NEW 1 ZEALAND?

4 : The New Zealand -Daiiry "Produce Control Board considers that restriction of production , is; impossible* The, alternative it ( suggests .is the 'establishment _of u system ,of absolute free trade between. New. Zealand aud' Great ’Britain before th'e expiration of the Ottawa agreement. v .- To that end the -Government has been requested by the Board to reduce forthwith, the du.iies on British goods to a point to meet theii increased, cost resulting from the recent, increase in tlie rate of exchange. The problem is proving a particularly, knotty one for the Government to solve. Besides, there is the British Government, as, the othe r party, to, the Ottawa rgreement, to be consulted and satisfied. But the ‘fanner’iS:-interest in imports j»3 iipt greater than this own .particular needs, and already some 90 per cent, of imports for his business a-r e .admitted; duty free and exempt from sale,? tax. The New 'Zealand -manufacturers are alarmed at O'e proposal to admit; duty free British, goods th t will compete with their own. The Government’s idea; -is that the present! problem;: ‘of over' supply of dairy produce from the Dominions to. Great Britain is : a matter for .consultation and coioperdtion : ihi iorder ;to find'a:.way oiiti ; ;" ;

The avertge . price ,of : New, Zealand) butter in London, in March,, 1932; lay! between. 115-3 and 118 s per ewt.; it was down to 63s- to 70s for the last! week -in March, this, year. At 115 s the farmer received the benefit of the 10. per, cent, rate: of .■ exchange on ' London, Now lie is receiving;-25; per. cent., and is obviously very much worse off th fi j-hfie wa B , last.- year ; in - fact, he;- cannot go on at such 'prices. The New Zealand Importers-' Association, represent-, ing interests', long -engaged in the handling of butter., and cheese. in the. United ■Kingdom, ha©( counselled; '.r'greemojit to a policy of -restriction of expotrV °| butter., t-pi -the- United Kingdom* ip: the expectation that wich reduced quantities arriving in this, the only worth-while and frep market for. NewyZealand pro•dnce, the effect• ’of .curtailed, supplies

will, bring with it-an advnce fin prices that will fully compensate for the ex'pense in holding back, further supplies which are mutually agreed to .be abnormal. "■ •

The circumstances in Australia '°,re entirely different where there is fin operation a scheme by which tb© local .market is made., to pay some shillings per -cwt. more, for butter consumed in Australia 1 thariA 1 the price : realised . for -A‘usendian, butter, in London. Thus the butter is compensated ' for law prices abroad be enhanced prices at home. He has, in addition, a very

much’ greaterc local market than! %' the case with the New Ze land producer;

The acting chairman of - the New Zealand Dairy Producers’ Control Board has already shown that- the Dominion cannot entertain: .restriction)? of exports 'of butter'- -because, unlike Australia, lithas a. very limited local market not 'capable of absorbing more than the existing high consumption of 401 b. of butter per head) per mpum. Its-- production of butter has -been increasing at tbo- rate of 10 pe r cent, per annum for some years past. -? '

--‘ Production of- butter for season '(August to May) i? estimated at- 158,000 to 159,000 tonis, and ell that the . domestic market- cain , absorb, heavy .as' its-.. coppriuiption is to-dav and likely to be. is 26.000 tons, the balance being:, available:-for, export. sjfew; Zeaand ' has n: population of l,500 v 0() :(-.Aus•trplia, with:, - :b»He r , a. population oP 6.550.000, and. altvdys the possibility of drought making a.b,sorption of. KuppUes.''efisy. 1 ; . whereas, fortunately, in many, ways, New Zeai ■lafid'has no ground? for fear of -drought or anything of the kind beyond com-; parativelv short spells of dry weather in certain ' localities.

Australia could afford to agree to re-, sfriction of exports of butter to the United .Kingdom ; New Zealand, according to the Dairy Producers’ Cc,n----t-fol Board, could not do anything of the kind without courting certain disaster. . ■

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19330825.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 25 August 1933, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
668

BUTTER QUOTA Hokitika Guardian, 25 August 1933, Page 3

BUTTER QUOTA Hokitika Guardian, 25 August 1933, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert