LIBEL CASE
HEARING PROCEEDING. (Per Prsss Association - Copyright.) Wellington, dime 13. The libel action against Sievwi'ight was tontiaiued, Mr O’Leary for defend; ut said a formula had been prepared by. Ruddle, analytical chemist, and he and plaintiff bad sold it to the •company which was registered as Nados Company. The sale of the formula was completed. The sale of ell rights connected with it •be'onged wholly to Nados Company and when Boddy was getting moi\ey on it in Wellington. Hie .was acting fraudulently. • Counsel submitted that ; .wheii, a'jpjet)' 'eral 'v charge ‘of diehpneßty, was l , made; ■ and rot a specific ehat’g© oii a. certain date it was sufficient for a plea of justification to prove that plaintiff had acted es was laileged,. even althoiigh defendant .{did did have knowledge 0 1 these acts at the time he made his allegations. Evidence is. being heard-
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19330613.2.65
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 13 June 1933, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
144LIBEL CASE Hokitika Guardian, 13 June 1933, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in