DISARMAMENTS
A DISAGREEMENT. OVER “AGGRESSOR” TERM. (United Br e ss Association-:—By. Electric Telegraph-Copyright.) (Received May 30 at- 12.30 a.m.) LONDON, May 29. The Disarmament Commission is split over the definition of an aggressor. France supports M. Politis’ hard -and fast definition, which will automatically release sanctions in given cases. Britain; Germany, Italy and America support a more elastic definition. Britain refused to allow her independence to be prejudiced by arbitrary rules. The discussion was adjourned for a week.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19330530.2.66
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 30 May 1933, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
78DISARMAMENTS Hokitika Guardian, 30 May 1933, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in