Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RUSSIAN POLICY

DISCUSSED IN HOUSE OF LOROS

LONDON, April 20

lii the House of Lords, Lord Pousonby raised the question of the Government’s Russian policy, and protested against the embargo on Ruivaii, goods.

He suit! that though the IJ'nglish engineers should he released, there Was no need anywise for a breach of Ang-lo-Russian relations. The Government had adopted the worst possible manner in handling the Moscow ,'al problem. Sir J. Simon deliberately worked the Commons to frenzied indignation, then followed pure ./eloclraiua, the. Privy Council meeting i-nvly in the morning at,Windsor.;" If,Che Government had delayed the embargo for 4&i 'hours, Thornton and MaciDonald would have been liberated by now. Foreign press opinion was convinced that without the Government’s blundering, the remaining prisoners yeuld have been quickly deport id. The whole business showed that the' Gow ernmcnt’s principal desire was to use the case as an excuse again for a breach of relations.

Lord Hailsham, replying, said every syllable of Lord Ponsonby’s speech l was calculated to prevent the release of Thornton,and MacDonald. By some odd kjuk in mentality, British Social- j ists were always disposed to think i their own country was in the- wrong. I This fallacy did not characterise the Socialists in any other country. Presumably as they desired the releases, j the Labourites were convinced of the Englishmen’s innocence, and must

therefore admit there 'had been a gross miscarriage of justice. The early Council meeting at Windsor was held for His Majesty’s convenience. Presumably, Labour would have done nothing ,in the matter, hut simply awaited the Soviet’s pleasure not to press the sentences. The facts did not bear out the suggestion that the men would, have been liberated if the embargo had not been enacted. “I am glad that Lord Pqnsonb.v stated the Government desired a breach with Russia, as it enables me

to state categorically it is untrue. The powers were obtained solely to secure the, lives and liberties of our men. There is no intention of using them for any other purpose. The embargo will continue only so Jong as Thornton and MacDonald are in prison.”

Lord Ponsonby forced a division on his motion calling for papers. It was defeated hv 53 t 0 ■7.

The British embargo on Russian

imports came into operation at 5 P'.m. to-day. Any goods now receiv-

ed from there, must he taken back to Russia, or. bfe disposed of elsewhere.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19330513.2.54

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 13 May 1933, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
401

RUSSIAN POLICY Hokitika Guardian, 13 May 1933, Page 6

RUSSIAN POLICY Hokitika Guardian, 13 May 1933, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert