Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

N.Z. RAILWAYS

CONDITIONS IN BILL

PRIVATE CONTROL OF OLD LINES, ) (Per Press Association Copyright.) WELLINGTON,' March 8. In the House, :on 'the .introduction o«the Railways , Amendment Bill, Mr Forbes said it gav e Hie Government power to negotiate with private companies .for taking over t.ffij railway lines wliidh h:d been abandoned. Inquiries had been made, in the Gi®* borne district about the possibility of taking over a line there. He would not say. a company was .prepared-to take over the, line, but the Government was asking for power; to carry out negotiations,, in case some company did want to take over the line, and run it for the benefit of th e people of the .district. - -• ■ Mr Armstrong (Lab., Christchurch Edst) : Wliy not put the unemployed on to finish the. lines; Mr .Forbes; It i* sot-a question of finishing .it; It is a question of running it after it has been, finished. The Leader of fhe Opposition said that if a private company could finish the line, 5 and ruir it successfully, that., was surely- a declaration of ■ in-, Competence /An the .payf-Gof / the Goveiliiment.. Surely-/ •tluv, correct': polity ! Was for the . Government to- /complete . the line instead of parting with State, assets, they should be consolidated, Mr Forbes : It not an aKSpty it is G. a liability, '■ / ■ K Mir Holland said that Mr Forbes must know that ■no private . -company would take over a . liability- tHiafc : ; had ~ been incurred to date. The ’unemployed should he engaged on the completion .of the line ' Other Labour members contended the line should bo completed by the Government instead of * being handed over to private enterprise. Mr C. L. Carr... (Lab;,. Timtfru),•. suggested the ..Bill was .the thin-;end; of th e wedge. It was- possible the ' Government would eventually abdicate control of the railways altogether,' to private enterprise. A ’Mr ;K. S. Williams • (Goyt., Bay of Plenty),' .said that when the Government, declined to complete the. Walroa— line, he approached \Mr Forbes, and asked if the Government would , allow a private company to..take over the undertaking. Nothing could be done in the formation of a syndicate until it was known, on. what, terms; the . Government was prepared to negotiate. He could not promise a syndicate would the district’s point of view, <tbafc if the Government would not, complete the line, some one else should be given an opportunity' to do so. * ‘/- • D’.Mr S. W. Coleman (Govt.,' Gisborne) gsud Gisborne people would... prefer the line to be completed by tlfie Government, but failing that, desired an opportunity 'P to bo given someone ..cleoG to do > the work. • ■ Th e Bill was read the firSt. time,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19330309.2.41

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 9 March 1933, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
441

N.Z. RAILWAYS Hokitika Guardian, 9 March 1933, Page 5

N.Z. RAILWAYS Hokitika Guardian, 9 March 1933, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert