Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POISONING CASE

(Per Priss Association Copyright .) NURSE' KERR’S DEFENCE BEGINS. VERONAL WAS NOT A POISON. (Pt Press Association — Copyright.) AUCKLAND, March 7. Counsel for the defence of Nurse Kerr, charged with administering vercrnal to her foster-daughter, Dorothy Betty C'-rmeron, with intent to injure her, and so as to endanger her life, bagan his addres l} to the jury this morning.

Mr Singer referred first to the many months during which the Crown had been preparing its case. It was eight months yesterday since Nurse Kerr was arrested, and he pointed out that, in July, accused was charged with administering poison on March 28th. That charge has been dropped. Tbe charge •relating to April 8 was an ' afterthought, and the'important dates were April 10 and 16. Th e prosecution, in preparing its case, had gone everywhere, seen everybody, and even at nights during th. e trial, they had been pursuing inquiries in an attempt to fill i u the cavities. There ihad been witnesses upon whose evidence no reliance could be placed. ■Counsel complained that the matter published in the newspapers, as well ■as the tongues of others had started rumours about the case, and hostility had been bred towards accused. The word “poison” had been in the aU svire accused's name was first mentioned. Veronal was not a? poison, hut the press and public had made it *3O. Veronal was in common use, and had been for years. At the Auckland hospital it was not kept in the poison cupboard, but whs always easily available for u-e when patientis were restless. It was not on the schedule • of poisons, and no chemist had to keep a, record of its sales.

i Counsel said that' this charge was 1 tK, first in history of using veronal-with intent. In all other c?s o s the charge had beep one 0 f .administering and cans. | ing death. He wanted to say now that the defence to this ease was 'absolutely flawless and unanswerable, and there .’■had been no anticipation of it by the Grown. Tlie , efts? is proceeding.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19330307.2.59

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 7 March 1933, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
345

POISONING CASE Hokitika Guardian, 7 March 1933, Page 6

POISONING CASE Hokitika Guardian, 7 March 1933, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert