“QUIET SEND-OFF.”

Hokitika Guardian, 22 February 1933, Page 2

“QUIET SEND-OFF.”

PARTY HAS SEQUEL IN COURT'

POINT OF LAW INVOLVED

AUCKLAND, February 20. - The question. w3iethe r it is within the law to accept monetary contributions in connection with a social function at which intoxicating liquor, purchased for the purpose, is consumed, was involved i'n charges heard in the JWaihi Police Court, when two young men, (Gordon, Menzies, of Auckland, barman, and Eric 'Rowe, Waiffi, minei, pleaded not guilty to a charge of selling liquor without a license i'n November last.

Evidence showed that a committee of young men was formed to arrange a ,farewell to Menzies, who was leaving th e town. A 'hall was engaged by Rowe, and a doorkeeper appointed who accepted contributions for the purpose of defraying the general expenses of the function, including a presentation, no fixed charge being made. A sum of £3 15s was handed to Menzies, who was employed at -a hotel, to purchase liquor. . ■ ■ . , Constable Welch said be interviewed Rowe, who stated that Menzies «fld suggested the s end-off himself ar.d that some had paid 2s 6d each and otheis As. Constable Parker, wlio visited the hall during' th e proceedings, said he was informed that a keg of beer was missi'ng,' and that 'ithe barman, having consumed' too -much' liquor, had resigned. (Laughter). “Menzies informed him that he. was th e guest of the even. The careaker of The hall, in evidence, stated that' Rowe bad engaged the ball for a “quiet send-off.” (Laughter). Certain damage was done and a ew windows broken. Counsel said members of the committee agreed that Menzies had ordered liquor at their request. This was th e first prosecution of the kind ma- e during his six years’, residence m F. W. Platts, S.M., reserved hie judgment.