Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

(To the Editor.) Sir.—Re my criticism of the seleo tors in the matter of the team to meet tho Christchurch touring-players, in your issue of 24th inst., kindly grant me spate in which to thank Mr S. Whitehead for his explanation) in to-day’s issue. Whilst exonerating Messrs Whitehead and o ’“Connor, the explanation does not reflect to the- credit- of the Suh-Association and its management of .affairs. Of three selectors, only one (presumably) is notified that a team is to he selected! Great! This revelation should have the effect of tii-ring rip tjie different clubs, and particularly the playing members thereof to take steps to prevent a recurrence. I think Mr Whitehead should have gone further and informed us who actually selected the team, and if such selection is valid. Yours etc. Hit Wicket Hokitika, 28-12-32.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19321229.2.11.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 29 December 1932, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
136

Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 29 December 1932, Page 3

Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 29 December 1932, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert