Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MILL ACCIDENT

QUESTION OF COMPENSATION. (Per Press Association — Copyright ./ ‘ DUNEDIN, November 18. In the Arbitration Court to-day a claim for compensation was brought, to determine in the first place, the question of liability. The plaintiff was employed on the threshing mill, which was taken by its owner to the defendant’s farm. While at work plaintiff fell from the top of the mill and was injured. The question at issue was wlietliei the mill owner or the farmer Was the responsible party, and the court, attar evidence, decided that the .plaintiff was in the employ of the farm r. The matter of compensation was held over for further hearing.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19321119.2.38

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 19 November 1932, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
108

MILL ACCIDENT Hokitika Guardian, 19 November 1932, Page 5

MILL ACCIDENT Hokitika Guardian, 19 November 1932, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert