Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The removal of the general tariff on certain ol asses of goodls at Ottawa was not a condition of the Ottawa Agreement, which dealt only with the British preferential tariff. It had been decided upon by the New Zealand Government as a policy measure under the powers conferred by an enabling clause (Article 10) of the agreement. It was pointed out for the future guidance of manufacturers, that the discussions at Ottawa showed tli) it the Government regarded the rates of duty under the general tariff as already sufficiently high, if not. indeed, too high, having regard to their effects on the cost of living in ,N'e>w •Zealnind. This was quite definitely the mse where there were certain suggestions for diverting trade to British sources by increasing the duties on the corresponding foreign (products. These' teuggestjons found no favour from the official New Zealand delegates, and it might be -well to realise that any future adjustments of foreign duties would apoarentlv tend downwards rather than upwards, at least as a general policy. It would he noted, however, that the general principle involved in this policy was departed .from to some extent in connection with the items specified in schedule E of the agreement. This provided for certain 'agreed preferences on .some of 1 he products of non-self-governing colonies and (Protectorates; and in ,applying this clause the Government had found it necessary to amend the general tariff in an upwards direction. It was found, however, that the United Kingdom delegates

were particularly desirous of securing those margins of preference for the non-self-governing territories. The final decision of the official New Zealand delegates, after a careful study of our import statistics, was that these requests could be granted without serious detriment to New Zealand industries; and that as the concessions asked for in other directions were admittedly moderate, it was not desirable to oppose the requests for preferences on raw products included m schedule E.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19321118.2.17

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 18 November 1932, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
323

Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 18 November 1932, Page 4

Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 18 November 1932, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert