versation betAveen the respondents and - th 6 appellant’s architect, ( in. which one • • of the respondents had stated that he "guaranteed that the 'bricks will be successful for the purpose.’’ . He (Sir / 'M. Myers) av&s of the opinion, however, that the respondents did no more than make representations about the . quality of their bricks, and that they did not intend to contract Avith appellant. The appeal, therefore, Avould be dismissed, Avith costs according u> scale. ' HOUSE MEETS. NATIONAL EXPENDITURE WELLINTON, Sept'." 30. • Tlie House of Kiet at 10.30 a.m. ro nr "' : ‘ :C The report of the. Exjopnditure Commission w«s laid on tlie table by the Pin roiepVlmister/ Mr .Forbes said it Avas hoped to conclude the Address-in-Reply debate >oday, and in that' event the Budget Avould be brought doAvn on Tuesday evening. The Budget debate would commence on Thursday evening. The intervening period, namely all Wednesday and also Thursday afternoon Avould be devoted to a discussion on the National Expenditure report. The Address-in-Reply debate was resumed by Mr Poison and was still in progress when the, House adjourned at 1 p.m.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320930.2.45
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 30 September 1932, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
180Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 30 September 1932, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in