Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OTTAWA REVIEW

MR COATES INTERVIEWED BETTER PREFERENCE MARGINS (Per Press Association— Copyright.) WELLINGTON, September 18.. Interviewed' ’ 6h"' His*' arrival to-day from Ottawa, Mr’ Goateg expressed pleasure ait being 'back tome week ß earlier, than anyone , had- been able to hntioipatd. The conference had lasted only four weeks', an unusually short tim 6 for. such. an assembly. 1 Thighad .meant a rush of work/iand 'had allow-, ed little Ire©,,itime, but,;it'was satisfactory to be''back at one’s “dst. Re said: “Now. that' 4 ' Pdrli&fhfint : is ■ meeting in three days’ .tin»/»*l*i am preparing to lay details ;’ ,} of rT (th© 'Ottawa ’'"agreements before the- "House. .I .ex-’ pect that, as soon as ' the A'ddfess-m-Reply is out of the way, w© shall have "ready (in printed form a report of the Conference, and Copies will distributed ito members to enable discussion ,fo take -place sin tlhe .light of full information. Perhaps the best ' way; to. see the measure of success of the Con 7 ference is to call to .mind, how in-,. tense ouir disappointment would have been if: it had failed, or where we would, have stood in regard to New Zealand exports to the United Kingdom if the Conference had not been held.” • :/■ . ’ ” “ r

(‘The position was that “ general customs duty, covering butter, cheese, milk . .products, fruit’ and - other pipducts whidh w©, export’ had. been im- ’ posed by the United Kingdom; temporarily and until the, l“th. of .November -this year. Our :; exports wer©. ©xemipt from that duty, hut, bad it not been (for the Ottawa agreement, that tariff wpuld have fallen on /our export: in |November., .Thanks to.- th e Conferen'ce, they are to remain free/of duty, while competing imports, from/ foreigr countries ; carry 'a tariff . that will give/ ‘New • Zealand substantial; , preference. Then the margin/ of preference ! -hae vbeen increased on many/ -important, •New Zealand products/ The highest riate previons’yj ten. . per. cent., or thereabouts, us .to be granted on oui •butter, chees© and other milk products, •friiit, eggs and honey. This means; a fifty per 'cent.- increase on the. former .margin of preference. Another valuVable and novel feature-of “he agree-, ment is that preferential 'margins are guaranteed to continue in favour of New Zealand for at least five , years. The duties -on competing, . foreign pro-, ducts> • it’ is agreed,, “shall not -dufced -except. with. the consent of /His - Majesty's .Government in -'New- Zealand” ' . t‘A/different method has been adopted for assisting the meat producers of the - Ehipire.. The UnitedKingdom.' undertakes, to regulate• its import', - from. foreign countries of. ail -meat. -,Jn- ; ihidipg ‘bacon and pig meats, /beef., mutton-' and lamb. / Tbeeq ArO to .be restricted to an extent ii'/set put,; ih / bhek. ;arid v.white inihe agreement - : abd The’ two-fold-/purpose ,is to “1“* -th e prices to a;remujiaratiye level:lg!rid ; fb increase ’the - /Dominions’ .share dm ‘the meat market, of the United /Kinu- - 'dom. To-day the Dominions. ' supply, 'Only '24 per cent, of th©'United- King•’do'm’is meat imports.: Foreign sources “supply T 6 per cent, of Britain's, meat.. That ie a position which can and will >‘b e ; . improved. Furthermore th fe meat’ markets of- the 'United Kingdom, partidularly in the past year or two, have been flooded with imports of bacon and other meats, .whibh have been shutout of 'the Continental market-S-Thi-led-to a--disastrous price collapse, • and■to a waste of supplies-beyond-rnnything-the market could absorb; ' - In short, ,'the ulea,t position was on e which ■no tariff -could correct, 'in any case,- as fai as meat was concernetl. -It was- made perfectly clear to the' Dominions at Ottawa that tlhe British Governineht ' cduld not fat the present time ’ contemplate any tariff on meat. Reports to’ the contrary, statements to the effect’ that the Dominions rejected an offer oi ; k'.’-teriff'-«fad4«#!ted-:ih‘6tfea'd'' on ‘the regulation Of th© quantifiies of the meat 'irriports while'The: ■ British / Minis/: ters Opposed this pfev are- utterly ' : ffilsr and niisleadingi This : is -cSrie ’ <>f 5 tiie misunderstandings that have' been con-veyed‘-to tlhe people in New Zealand. The • bet-Ween New Zealand arid ' Great Britain- 'on the subject of meat is--'set out in a letter Which 1 addre-soil ’.to Mt Baldwin. This letter/ except for ia few seutence-s. (which niust remain oonflderitial;' pending certfiin negotiations with . foreign countries), I shall release at" an' early date.” "“/

' i “It miist be Expected, aiid 'everj ■reasonable iperson: will' agree l ! -tha’,t New Zealand, 1 for' 'lifer 'part, 1 should extend" some reciprocal advantages to Britain. iCertain ' changes on " : the Customs' schedule jhage been lagreed to, : and these .will 'be brought' before (Parliament during the" session. They cannot, pf course, be discltised in advance',' biii T'iam confident House an<f the ftiutitry will Itj©' when the l’st is made known. Wn -have agreed "/so ’to ’removb the prithage duty "on Unit’d Kingdom goods, when ‘financial- conditions the surtax from the United ' Kihgdbm «"X)ds at btice. ' •o-.,.'-w- ;•' 1 The' Agreement provides that the existing margin's of preference ih fhv...tr ,nf n,vtain up to 20 per cent, will bfc retained. ;"/.V • * ' “We agree that „ tlie * protection tff our' local industries;' will indt'excei?d: the level reqdired '-ito safeguard economical, efficient production; By po' m'eans all of the value of Ottawa- can' be' measured in' 'th 6 terms of tariff preferences -d 'customs schedules.- Tibc Confer--o'tco covered a; far .-wider - field..’;' thtfn thnt,;. The raising of-the level df ,ntir •■ ••'res was recognised , as a. matter ■i]i:4 importance, ' No. matter:"what ;jdo '?• i i ■?f vi": * .-i • u,.',W. •

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320919.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 19 September 1932, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
888

OTTAWA REVIEW Hokitika Guardian, 19 September 1932, Page 3

OTTAWA REVIEW Hokitika Guardian, 19 September 1932, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert