Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EXPORT EXCHANGES

“SPECIAL TAX ON PRODUCER.”

CRITICISM BY DAIRYMEN

FEILDING, August 30

‘‘lt was a .th-ng to no, and undoubtedly amounted to a spec’al tax on the producer,” commented -Mr : C. O C.'Dei’mer when dealing with the control of export exchanges. Mr Dernier said that iiom January J ;to June .30 itlie Government had, by lOrder-in-Oouncil, taken control of the -export exchange to enable it to secure its requirements of Jxmdoji money. This was a drastic measure,-as,, it really -meant exchange; that would have probably been paid to the producers. The producer was rightly entitled to the amount his produce brought in English mot jy, and t-o its equivalent in New -Zealand. Such .pooling of exchange -really amounted to a special tax upon the primary producers. It was noticeable, continued Mr Dermer, that an attempt had been iiia'd 6 by city ’ interest -and the press generally ito draw, a red herring across the trail by assuming that the produce ■was asking ~for An artificial exchange. Such a thing was never sought, the only contention of the pi'Oducei' beiiig that 'the exchange should be allowed to, ■ ito free without any restrictions what-, soever.

“The New Zealand farmer*is working •it - a disadvantage compared with the Australian farmer,” 'said Mr Dermer. “As an indication of the effect or the ■exchange position, the -premium in Australia is at present 25 per cent., which niakes -an added return to the Aflstraiian . producer of approximately 3d a lb. on butter-fat. In the cage of Ney Zealand, if is 8* per cent, oh' demand drafts, and this helps the return of: outproduce by about Id a lb. .. ( ‘T<he-d'ffeiv-eace in favour of the Australian produce, is therefor P . a out, "dr a lb. In -addition, owing to the ■Patterson scheme, the Australian producer receives a further premium on his butter exported. This combination of advantage, has enabled a payment to him'of Is od, which is approximately 6d -a pound better than we are receiving in this Dominion.’’

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320831.2.24

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 31 August 1932, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
329

EXPORT EXCHANGES Hokitika Guardian, 31 August 1932, Page 3

EXPORT EXCHANGES Hokitika Guardian, 31 August 1932, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert