Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TAXI OR SERVICE ?

PRIVATE PARTY IN CAR. TRANSPORT TEST CASE. MASTERTON, August 2.

The first case in the Wairarapa to be' brought before a Court under the Transport Act 1931, came before Mr j. Miller, S.M.,- in the Masterton Magistrate’s Court on Saturday. Andrfenv. J.. Chapman, the holder’of a transport Hcerise, all tho ri/siirig Him to carry on a .’.passenger service betweeiri Mastlerfebii fiiid Carterton, was charged with breaches of the terms of his transpprt. lidcrifi'e. It was alleged that on a trip on the night of June 24 he failed to adheila to his time-table and was tfih; minutes late in leaving Masterton, and also that he used two cars on the same Trip, - whereas' hlj is entitled 'to use only one per trip, v-Defendant denied that His car was ten minutes late-in Heaving Masterton, but said it might have been three minuts'n. ' His defence in respect to tile alleged breach of-running two cars on the one trip was based on the exception Section 21 of the Act, which provides that a piasseuger service license is not required in the case of the car-riage-qf a private party on a special

occasion. ’.' v .’j ' , In. .his. evidence defendant said that on the night in question he had been approached. oh behalf, of a party of four people and asked to convey tlieih to the pictures at, Masterton and to take them bach to Carterton after the picturcis.'; He liield fi taxi license for both Mast rton and Oavtertcn in ndditioii .tA his'- passenger-seirvice license.

Counsel for informant submitted that hlie defence that the extra car was being used as a contract vehicle or, a 'tiijci on the* particular occasion xftfs forbidden' by Section 38 of the \ci • Hte fiilso' submitted that the ocas. stated by defendant, was not a ( ‘‘sp c;ei al ’ ’ ofoaskm. ■ After hearing some /legal argument oitelfe point, the Magistrate/ observed ilifit it would he rather startling to fin;j that such a tiling could be done. The main question was what constituted a special occasion. The matter, Ire said, was on’e for consideration, and lie •would reserve his decision..

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320805.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 5 August 1932, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
351

TAXI OR SERVICE ? Hokitika Guardian, 5 August 1932, Page 2

TAXI OR SERVICE ? Hokitika Guardian, 5 August 1932, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert