Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BUTCHERS’ DISPUTE

BEFORE 'CONCILIATION COUNCIL. '' . • •; . / (Per Press Assoeiatiurir- Copyrights) WELLINGTON; July 26. ; . ■ The hearing of the Wellington butchers’ dispute wSi, begun in. the Conciliation Court to-day before 1 Mr W. •Newton, who is acting in. place of Mr HaHy, who is on leave. It appeared; from the initial remarks, that the.: employers have altered the original proposals, and the “'question was raised whether the whole the dispute should not commence de-novo. -ifMi- Newton said that, if the amend-d 1 proposals of the employers could not 'be discussed the employers would be in order in sayiiig rv that "airagreement could not be reached. This brought a reply that, ff they hoped'fc||lai|'agree, ment on the. employers’ ‘ proposals, it might as well be realised that it was impossible. “If that’s your best |qi4, ■Croskery, for the workers, “we 'arq not accepting St. There are other means of getting it. You may not like, “rafferty: rules’’ if you get them.” 1 It transpired that the employers offer for first shopman in.- the leading grade was originally £5 12s 6d, and now £5 7s 6d„ Hess . ten par chut., ~ oi £4 16s 9d, and t*e other, grades m proportion. ~ The Council afterwards . went into < rihmittee. \0 AGREEMENT REACHED. WELLINGTON, July 26. ,'fter an all day s.ot’big of the Conci’ ation Council to-day, no agreement was reached between the parties to t’-o, Wellington butchers’ dispute. The position now is that the award will empire one month from the date on which not : fication of. the. failure to agree is sent by the Conciliation Commissioner to the Clerk of Awards. Actin<>• Commissioner Newton presided. 'Hie' employers proposed varying reductions of wages, instances being. t .... ........ » r # 1

First shopmen ’from £5 17 s 6d down ' tc £5 7s 6d; other -workers from £4 15s to £4 ,7s 6d; youths up to 16 years, fro n 30s to 17s 6d. The employee* sought increases. In view of an inability to reach an agreement on 'wage 1- , it was coh-t'dered' futile to proceed with the discussion of the other clauses. ;v ANOTRER DISPUTE. WELLINGTON, July 26. The Wellington United Boilermakers’, Jron and Steel Ship and Bridge Builders’ Ujiion to-night resolutidned to refer its do lute w'th the employers to the Conciliation Council.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320727.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 27 July 1932, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
372

BUTCHERS’ DISPUTE Hokitika Guardian, 27 July 1932, Page 3

BUTCHERS’ DISPUTE Hokitika Guardian, 27 July 1932, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert