Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

N.Z. STAMP DUTIES

SOME HARSH - CRITICISM. ' ‘THE WORLD’® UGLIEST.”Some caustic criticism of New Zealand s postage -stamp designs is oft’e.led - in, the - latest issue of the “Australian- Stamp • Monthly.” Under the heading, “New Zealand. Does It Again,” the journal shy*:— “The powers that be' in New Zealand certainly - do> not let the grass growunder their feet when it comes to stamp issues. During the last year or two they- have gone from height to height in their efforts to- retain the palm awarded- them for the World’s Ugliest Stamp. They certainly deserve; congratulations on the -way they -have, against heavy opposition, -.maintained their pre-eminent position in;-this respect. “This month we again find them well to the fore, with: the latest issue- for their Island’dependencies.- This ifc-the Is value of the new Cook Islands and Nine series. Printed in-a particularly revolting -shade of purple, with a black centre, it shows a really clever caricature of the King, surrounded by fish bones picked clean. We have been told that- the bones are not bones but ferns, but we are sure that' no selfrespecting fern would this. No, bones-it-is, and the significance thereof is that N.Z. stamp designing and printing has how got down to the bare bones. We hope „ so, for anything worse would be too much, for longsuffering philatelists.” Apparently, however, ugliness lias it« virtues if combined with’, scarcity, footanother writer in the same; journal says: “This .new issue in the-Cook Is-

lands- anjd iNiue- should be obtained while it remains current.., ;It was not printed in v>e-ry large numbers, and as soon I *as-present supplies' are-, exhausted will ’be‘ replaced by the same- types on water-marked paper. I am partie‘ularly taken with the prospects of the j very ugly -'ls ' value. Correspondent's tell me that this stamp wa-s only printed to the time of a fie-w thousand, as the stamps were rejected a-s unsuitable. It was, in fact, decided not to iissue this value, but owing to supplies of ls j stamps running out, tliis deci-sion was Ireverse-l, and the small available supply -issued.” •

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320719.2.70

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 19 July 1932, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
344

N.Z. STAMP DUTIES Hokitika Guardian, 19 July 1932, Page 8

N.Z. STAMP DUTIES Hokitika Guardian, 19 July 1932, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert