Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REFUND CLAIMED

DECISION FOR COMPANY

(Australian Press Association.)

NELSON, June 28,

A decision of interest to dairy factory suppliers was given by Mr Maunselil, S.M., in a defended case, Waimea Dairy Coy. Ltd., v. William Max, a claim for £3 15s sd, in respect to a refund of an over-advance made on butterfat supplied to the Company. The Magistrate held that the Company were entitled to recover from che defendant th e amount either for money paid under mistake of fact, or upon the ground that the provisions' oi Article' 17 are an implied term of the contract. Leave' for appeal was granted.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320629.2.38

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 29 June 1932, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
103

REFUND CLAIMED Hokitika Guardian, 29 June 1932, Page 5

REFUND CLAIMED Hokitika Guardian, 29 June 1932, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert