Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AUCKLAND RIOTS

VERDICT TO-DAY. ARGUMENT FOR THE DEFENCE. (By Telegroyh —Per Brest Association) A UCKLAND, May 26. The trial cf fcurteon men accused of rioting wa ( s continued to-day, when Sharpe and Martinovich, two of the accused gave e.’.deuce, denying that there were : nily thing more than spectators. Each', ir.au called witnesses in support. (.ouiirel for accused Searles, then addressed the jury, contending that in the circiimst .re . of the riot, accurate ideutificatlci! was impossible. A verdict is (xpooced lu-muvow in the. case "in which fourteen men are being tried in ihe Supreme Court on charges arising out ol the noting which occurred in-the city on the night, of April 14th.' The hearing of evidence:dt#^Jtnes s os for the defence was concluded this afternoon,' Tim three counsel representing the accused completed their adresses to the 'jury to-day. An iiti'itsim! 7 large number of wilii(css"s was ic r'-'d during the trial. I he Crown called 62, ‘while''the defence called 26, a total of 78. Almost four day* were neon pied in caking the evidence. Addressing the jury, counsel for eleven of the accused submitted that those ill the pr.:< osrirn >•'( r-> no 4 - -e----sponsihlo for the damage done while the procession was on march. I hoic wus nothing to link up any of the accused with window breaking. “1 do not think it will take you ,

very long to reach a decision in these cases,” said counsel. “ r i here is a grave danger of these men being blamed for the acts of other people.” Counsel for Sharpe and Martinovich asked why the Crown had associated James Edwards with the men on trial. The jury would have seen with what vigour the Crown Prosecutor had pursued all the witnesses along a Communistic road; but this had not been a Comunistie riot. Counsel argued that Sharpe was the In-t type of individual to lie associated with violence cm! disorder. He also said that the police evidence against Martinovich was nebulous and unsatisfactory. Counsel for Serrle said that ■ the police had made a mistake in identification. Hit; ll<uioi:r .'dd lb"i. i! would b<‘ impossible to finish the ease that cveniand he rdjourued it until the morning.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320527.2.5

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 27 May 1932, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
363

AUCKLAND RIOTS Hokitika Guardian, 27 May 1932, Page 2

AUCKLAND RIOTS Hokitika Guardian, 27 May 1932, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert