DIVORCE REFUSED
EXPERIMENTAL RE'UN. ONS
By Teleguiph —Pei Press Association)
WELLINGTON, May 25. Judgment was given in the Supreme Court to-day by Mr Justice Blair in a divorce action in which, subsequent to a deed of -separation being entered into, there was evidence of the parties hav-i-i'jr made unsuccessful experimental reunions. Tlie petitioner was Isaac Bnty. He founded his petition lor a divorce from his wife, Margaret Baty, on the ground of mutual separation. In giving his decision His Honour said that an unusual course ol procedure had been adopted by the parties aft e r they had entered into the deed ~f -separation i.n 1925. Apparently the parties, although separated and living in different, towns, made more or less a -habit of spending their holidays together. They resumed ordinary marital .relations, and then they parted, the parties returning to their respective occupations. The petition wn- dismissed, wi|h costs, on the lowest scale. His Honour added that the fa-ct remained that the petitioner had alleged mutual separation, and, in his view, .(ihe petitioner had not been -able to establish that. mm ~" ni T
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320526.2.13
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 26 May 1932, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
183DIVORCE REFUSED Hokitika Guardian, 26 May 1932, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.