Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COMPANIES ACT

NEED OF STRENGTHENIN'C. CHIEF JUSTICE'S VIEW. WELLINGTON, February 23. "It is about time the provisions of (ho Companies Act were strengthened, as they have been ill pngland. In England there was legislation passed as fallback as 1929. I think it was dealing 'with a lot of these matters. Apparently we, arc still thinking about ,t." remarked the Chief Justice, Sir AlL'ho el .Myers, while hearing an action. “What do you mean by an ‘abridged prospectus?” 'his Honor asked one witness.

Witness: I don't know. His Honor: l don’t know, and 1 am asking you because it is your language. Witness : I wanted to have the prospectus printed. I submitted it to the assistant registrar of companies, but it was not approved. 1 then made the alterations which I considered the assistant registrar of companies required. . ■ Counsel : You say you were advise to have the prospectus printed in t >•> Witness: Yes. It was not fraud. Me did not do it with any intention ol His .Honor : AJI 1 can say is, it dues not necessarily connote fraud at all, but you made a beautiful mess of >b Counsel : Did you take legal advice. Eis Honor: If the suggestion is that he was. advised to take this course by the assistant registrar of companies. j mm sav is that it is hardly ia.r to too assistant registrar. 1 don't believe such advice was ever given. The ass.stan revistrar would not advise him as to the issue of a new prospectus. , U a later stage his Honor said: d think it is well worth while dn t w authorities to consider whet her a. > prospectus should he allowed to go to the public unless it hears a < u 1 1 •* 1 of some authority or author! u-s. know, of rouse, there is a danger that, because if a prospectus bears tu imprimatur, of any Government ofh.e tlu ! Sll g U estioil is that the Government ought to he responsible ’ im ' IIS ‘"'-J Joss. 1 know that is a difficult, b. i, does occur to me that there on eh ■ to be some half-way home so that • least people ran he sure that the U. of the prospectus have'been fully considered by someone otlir, Ibe promoters themseives.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320226.2.68

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 26 February 1932, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
375

COMPANIES ACT Hokitika Guardian, 26 February 1932, Page 8

COMPANIES ACT Hokitika Guardian, 26 February 1932, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert