Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHINA AND JAPAN

LEAGUE COUNCIL. Press Association.—By Electric Telegraph.—Copyright. 1 GENEVA, October 21. To-dav saw the close of another black day in which the League of Nations’ circl.es have been pessimistic, some fearing that China would he let down. The position is believed to be little, if any, more favourable, with tbe announcement that the Council w 11 tomorrow consider a resolution urging China and Japan mutually to settle the dispute within a specified period, which is b lieved to bs one of months.

Much still depends on the instrucj tions from Tokio, which bad not arl rived to-day at a late hour, although it is boned that the message will be | a concilinitorv one. If it is otherwLe, ' the League Council may insist on a precise date for the withdrawal of tbe | Japanese troops from Manchuria. SETTLEMENT IN JEOPARDY. IfIDNpON, October 22. ‘lTlie Times’ ” correspondent at Geneva believes that there is little chance of the C'hinaljapanese conflict ending, unless the" League of Nations’ undertakes to provide a guarantee for the good faith of both sides by exerting simultaneous pressure on both Governments, and making sure that this pressure will be effective by posting neutral observers on the spot. This method was successfully adopted with Greece nnd Bulgaria in 1920. The “News-Chronicle” says: The League of Nations’ Council’s resolution urging the Chinese and Japanese Governments to mutually settle the dispute lias caused dismay. The Chinese regard it as a betrayal of their interests, and the placing of a premium on aggression. The situation is described as profoundly disquieting. JAPAN’S REPLY. GENEVA, October 22. Japan’s reply to M. Briand's proposals are unsatisfactory. The Counci; meets in the a.fternon when tbe whole situation will be made public.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19311023.2.44

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 23 October 1931, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
285

CHINA AND JAPAN Hokitika Guardian, 23 October 1931, Page 5

CHINA AND JAPAN Hokitika Guardian, 23 October 1931, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert