Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Commenting on the unemployment problem a southern paper says the question for consideration is not now to finance unemployment, but how to re-a.bsorb in useful and productive occupation the tens of thousands who have been deprived of this opportunity of working. The experience of Great Britain with respect to unemployment relief lias bred a very natural distrust of thie dangers of sustenance payments, and it may he suggested that taxpayers in the Dominion will be considerably reassured by tlnis latest proposal, which establishes an additional safeguard against the possibility of a recourse to the system that has been followed in the United Kingdom. It is possible to argue that in the early stages of the unemployment crisis in this country the remedial measures that were adopted wejre not altogether unwise. They were not necessarily anybody’s choice. Stern necessity was the spur that forced the Unemployment Board to the decisions it made. It must, how. ever be generally recognised that a continuauoe of the Board’s original policy would be wholly uneconomic. The exigencies of the position demand the expenditure of a huge sum of money which the country cannot afford to waste on unproductive work, more especially sinctej opportunities for a more profitable use! of the funds available are not lacking. It was not to be supnosed at the outset that hard and fast rules could be laid down for the handling of the problem and the rap-idit-v with which the volume of unemplovmerit increased compelled the adoption of schemes that could he swift ly organised. The success, however, of any programme of relief depends upon a.ni intelligent adaptation of effort to a changing situation, and. while thte view must be held that the revision now proposed 4 should have been made a long t-ime ago, the UnemploymentBoard is to be com mended upon at la-st making an effort to secure some adequate return 1 for it immense outlay. With the pr. spect cf expenditure j on employment relief continuing for ( an indefinite period, it has become essential that a method shall be employed ' of applying the relatively huge amount that is appropriated for relief purposes

in a way that will have the desirable effect of assisting industry and promoting production.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19310929.2.21

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 29 September 1931, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
370

Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 29 September 1931, Page 4

Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 29 September 1931, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert