VERBATIM REPORTS
JUDGES’ SUMMING-UP. (By Telegraph—Per Press Association) AVELLINGTON August 10. “I t appears to me essential, in the interests of justice, that provision should be made for having a verbatim report of the summing up in every criminal trial taken bv a competent and independent shorthand writer,” stated Mr Justice MacGregor in a reserved judgment delivered, together with those of the Chief' Justice, Sir Michael Myers, and of Mr Justice Herdman, in the Court of Appeal yesterday. The case was one in which the summing up of Mr Justice Blair, in a criminal case, was in question. Full notes of the summing up were not before the Court.
“Most of the questions of law reserved under section 442 of the Crimes Act arise directly or indirectly out of the summing up delivered.by the judge who presided at the trial,” Mr Justice MacGregor said. “It is impossible for a Court of Appeal critically to consider such a summing up unless there is placed before it the actual words in which the jury were directed. In the present case it is obvious that a large part of the summing up is not now before the court, at all. How, then, can we he expected adequately to review it P” „ ' i i#i. .-'vdw.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19310811.2.55
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 11 August 1931, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
211VERBATIM REPORTS Hokitika Guardian, 11 August 1931, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.