Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BREACH OF PROMISE

C. C. BLACK. v TO PAY £175. (By Telegraph—Per Press Association) WELLINGTON, March 1. Damages amounting to £175 were awarded in the Supreme Court to-day against Charles Cecil Black, member of Parliament for Motueka, who was--* sued by Edith May Bartlett, spinister of AAEllington for £IOOO. Damages for breach of promise of marriage. In the course of his judgment, the Chief Justice (Sir Michael Mvers) said it had been clearly proved 'that there was an agreement To marry. In regard to the second defence that the ■engagement had been rescinded by mutual consent, thereby excusing defendant from the performance of the agreement. His Honour said that substantially he had accepted the plaintiff’s version of the matter.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19310302.2.51

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 2 March 1931, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
119

BREACH OF PROMISE Hokitika Guardian, 2 March 1931, Page 5

BREACH OF PROMISE Hokitika Guardian, 2 March 1931, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert