Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POLICE FILES OF EVIDENCE

USB IN THE COURTS. OBSERVATIONS BY CHIEF JUSTICE. WELLINGTON, February 27. Reference to the production of police files in civil proceedings was made in the Supreme Court yesterday during the hearing of a claim for damages following an accident. , All- AY. E. Leicester said that counsel often found themselves in a difficulty because- some Judges upheld the view of the Police Department that the production of statements could not be enforced. Mr F. AY. Ongley. replying to a question by the Chief Justice (Sir Michael Myers), said that polite files were held to be State papers which could not he made available. However, couns.d had been able in the past to arrange for constables who were to give evidence to look at the statements and thus refresh their memory. His Honour: It is the duty of the police to help in the-se eases, Mr Onglev • They have taken the other view. They say that they have to make inquiries and cannot allow the result of those inquiries to be- made available for civil proceedings. His Honour observed that it was the duty of the police to help in the adm-inist-rurtion of public justice. Of course, the police had to exercise a certain amount of discretion, and so must the Court. He could see no reason why in a case like that before the Court the statements required should not he produced. Tn some cases no doubts, the police might he quite right in declining to produce the documents. His Honour said lie could appreciate that there were circumstances in which such an attitude would lie perfectly right. The case before the Court, however, was merely !l matter between the two parties; the rights of the .State were in no way affected, and no criminal proceedings were pending. He could not see that it- was contrary to public policy that in such a ease tile police should produce the statements to help in the administration of fustic?. His Honour added that he- would make it clear that he was not laving down any general rule that in all such cases the police file should h e made available.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19310302.2.49

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 2 March 1931, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
361

POLICE FILES OF EVIDENCE Hokitika Guardian, 2 March 1931, Page 5

POLICE FILES OF EVIDENCE Hokitika Guardian, 2 March 1931, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert