Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PRECEDENCE CONTROVERSY

EFFECTIVE SETTLEAIENT. AIRS HOOVER’S DIPLOMACY. NEW YORK, December 20. The “season” at the White House opened this month, when the President: and Airs Hoover entertained their official family, the members of the Cabinet and tneir wives. On December 4 was tint reception to the Diplomatic Gups. Tlit'ii, cn succeeding 'Thursdays, the .Judiciary is received, the Vice-President comes to dinner, the diplomats return to dine, the Senate is received, the Chief Justice and his associates of the Supreme Court come to dinner, the House of Representatives is received, the Speaker is “dined,” the Army and Navy are received. The “season” ends with n dinner t.o the officials of the Treasury, post Office, and Department of the Interior. Agriculture, Commerce and Labour.

Perhaps the most notable act of Mrs Hoove, since her entry to t,he White House has been the settlement of the precedence controversy that rocked American society for a year. The VicePresident had no wife, but he had n sister, Wore she accepted ais his hostess, she would go to the head of the table, But she had a husband, If she attended as his wife, she would he at the foot of the table, if her modest spouse's social status earned an invitation. Air Roosevelt’s daughter, wife of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, refused to attend any function where the Vice-President's sister sati above her. Of all the suggested statements. AEs Hoover’s was the most diplomatic and the most eiFective. .She broke precedent in creating a snecial dinner for the Vice-Presi-dent,. at which the guests were to have no official status or precedence. The dinner to the Speaker was arranged on the same non-partisan basis.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19310204.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 4 February 1931, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
280

PRECEDENCE CONTROVERSY Hokitika Guardian, 4 February 1931, Page 2

PRECEDENCE CONTROVERSY Hokitika Guardian, 4 February 1931, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert