were represented bv an influential deputation, and the whole qucs.ion was discussed at considerable length, and all aspects were ventilated. When il came to a discussion by the Council, tin- Southern Riding munJiiS were equally divided in th-’ir attitude. Messrs Searle (county Chairman) and Donovan stood firmly for the original route, and Messrs Houston and Je.frius lor the Mclntosh proposal Mr Ward complained that in view of the equal division of opinion of the Southern representatives, there was no lead for other Councillors, but he elected to support Messrs Searle and Donovan in t-neir attitude. Messrs Chester. man. Wells, Keenan and Murdoch threw in their lot with Messrs Houston and Jeffries, and so the Mi).li tosh proposal was accepted by the Council by six votes to three. Mr Houston put tliu position quite frankly when he stated he was not there to represent any section of the South, hut the ratepayers as a whole. He saw by accepting Mr Mclntosh’s offer that tin County ratepayers as a whole would bo saved a large sum, and the Government would be saved expenditure, also, which would go to other necessary works ,in the locality, fin addition, there would be a considerable saving of time. The Mclntosh road was to be open in three months’ time, while by waiting fur grants it might take two, and probably three, years to finish. The attitude of the opposing eettWs certainly weakened their case, by declaring; in their speeches that the work wan urgent and neceNsary, and finally concluding with the statement that despite the urgency and necessity, they were agreeable to wait for proper access until the Government grants were available to complete the proper access! A strong point was made also o* the petition signed by 46 settlers, but here again, the position was weakened bv the fact that only four of the 46 were users of the road, and that some of there signing the petition, although living in the locality for many years, had been only in the vicinity of the disputed route once! Admissions such as that, at once di counted the value of many of the signatures to the petition. The position now is that road aeeffis will be provided speedily for those concerned, and that was naturally a 'consideration with the Council. The full measure for the cause of the opposition to this desirable climax was not disclosed, but evidently there was some underlying cause not made public so for.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19310114.2.26
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 14 January 1931, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
411Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 14 January 1931, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.