Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MR BUTCHERS’ BOOK

AUTHOR REPLIES TO WOMEN. ißy Telegraph—Per Press Association.i WELLINGTON, November 23. A reply to statemets made- by tin deputation of women which waited upon the Minister of Education yesterday, was made by Mr A. G. Butchers, author of the book “Education in New Zealand,” the contents of which inspired the deputation. He said that although the members of the deputation had argued that his warning was based on erroneous, illogical and unscientific deductions, they had produced no statistics and offered ..no .figures in support of that contention. Referring to certain passages to which strong exception was taken by the deputation Air Butchers said be was pleased that the women’s organisations had taken the matter up. Once the women of New Zealand were thoroughly aroused as to the facts he felt sure they would move heaven and earth to make him a false prophet, and if they succeeded in doing that no one would be more pleased than himself, but it was absurd that this matter should be discussed as if it concerned only the women of New Zealand.

In bis book he had expressly referred to the probable future morality of boys as ivell as girls. If, therefore, the statement made in his book was defamatory to the girlhood and womanhood of New Zealand, it was surely no less defamatory to its boyhood and manhood, yet, Mr Wright ivas apparently the only male member of the deputation. What had the men of New Zealand to say about it?

■ One would have thought, said Mr Butchers, that this would have been the first point made by the women’s deputation. It certainly was “a terrible indictment,” as -one woman had said, but it was an indictment of New

Zealand manhood as well as womanhood aud as the author of the book lie wished to make that clear, even though the women’s deputation had not done so.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19301125.2.21

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 25 November 1930, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
317

MR BUTCHERS’ BOOK Hokitika Guardian, 25 November 1930, Page 3

MR BUTCHERS’ BOOK Hokitika Guardian, 25 November 1930, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert