Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HOUSE OF LORDS

COAL BILL AMENDED

(By Telegraph—Press Association).

LONDON, July 15

The House of Lords by 168 votes to 36, has carried Lord Salislftry’s “Spreadqvei” of working hours amendment to the. Coal Mines’ Bill, which amendment the Government has already refused t° acceptThe House of Lords also defeated without, a division, a motion, for n conference of both of the houses. The Lord Chancellor, Lord Sankey, said that the Government could not accept the amendment, and that insistance. upon it . by. . thy House oi Lords, would cause widespread provocation and resentment.

Lod Salisbury said that his amendment mainly concerned the preference by the House of Lords for a “Spreadover” of ninety hours per fortnight, instead of having the rigid 'seven and a-half hours a day. The spreadover was to be optional. Tile miners were by no means unanimously opposed to jt.

The Chancellor ..replied that this proposal, in any case, could operate only for eight months, and it was therefore not worth the trouble that it Would cause. r '• ’• :/' ;

The House of Lords’ decision places the Government in the position of having to chose between the acceptance of their proposal or the qjiand-r. on merit’ of the Coal Bill. ; The, Ministers will • probably he driven to - the c method' “of- amending the amendment,” if it can induce the miners-to agree!

The-opinion is generally expressed that a’ way-will be found to save the Bill,' but' the'Dhily Herald describes it as being “the most serious challenge to the sunremaey of the popular will since the* House of Lords’ rejected of the budget in 1909.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19300717.2.50

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 17 July 1930, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
263

HOUSE OF LORDS Hokitika Guardian, 17 July 1930, Page 6

HOUSE OF LORDS Hokitika Guardian, 17 July 1930, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert