Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BRITISH POLITICS.

THE NAVAL TREATV

(United Press Association—By Electric Telegraph—Oopyrigh t).

LONDON, June 3

In the House of Cb'mmons, Major Hills (Conservative) Emphasised Hon Baldwin’s motion would' he regarded as a condemnation of the Treaty, if the Sea. 'Lords had failed in their duty or the (lovernment had disregarded their advice. A vote of censure should be moved otherwise Major Hills preferred to believe the Government had the sup port of professional opinion of the Admiralty (Labour cheers.)’ Hon, W. Churchill said the 1 Conservative Party asked that 1 there should be a searching examination of the derails of the Treaty before the country committed itself -irrivocally. It was a- treaty of inferiority in form and on paper. We ought! not to get into the position where'any Power, even the most friendly, had undoubted means to threaten us with starvation. He had no' hesitation'-' in saying the country was safer with;the five battleships which*'were being strapped under the Treaty, than .with the cm'sens which would have to‘ bej- built. Was that economy? This conference was the supreme failure of all conferences. Relations between Italy and France ha been definitely wot.sefi'&'d and the’ United Rta.tes„as, a, re,su|t of v , ; the Trentv would 'Spend' between' a 1 hundred and two hundred mill ions Jti..the ,next five yonr9. Mr A. Alexander isflid dn,'his heart of hearts Mr Churchill liacl no real desire for peace, ,y, Mr Baldwin’s motion was rejected by 28 to 201. /•< : LONDON. .Tone 3. Tn consequence .of the. Liberal Party’s decision to support: the Hons** of LoHs in the amendment to the Coni Bill, the Government will he faced with another o. critical division to-night. : n i. •

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19300605.2.30

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 5 June 1930, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
277

BRITISH POLITICS. Hokitika Guardian, 5 June 1930, Page 5

BRITISH POLITICS. Hokitika Guardian, 5 June 1930, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert