Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Guardian And Evening Star, with which is incorporated the West Coast Times. SATURDAY, MAY 10, 1930. WHEN LAND “GOES BACK.”

In tins young country the* farmer and tne settler are constantly faced by the necessity for keeping up the care and cultivation of tne soil to an adequate level, so as to prevent the land from ielapsing into its primitive condition. But many people, even when they have attempted to work land for themselves, are liable to take a very limited view of this problem. To prevent land from “going back,” in the sense ot ,failing to increase or to maintain its productive capacity, much more is needed than the attempt to keep down blackberry or fern or bush undergrowth. The, process of cultivation, even in a country with centuries of agricultural experience behind it, must e persistent and continuous; and Professor J. J. Findlay has recently declared that “if you once stop even lor ten years the progress of a farm it will be a mprvel if you can pull it round.” Tlie precise point of Professor Findlay’s dictum is its application to the present condition of rural England; and on this subject some of his remarks are well worth quotation. He has visited Sweden and found there that “farming pays,” and that the men and women “on the land” are for the most part prosperous and happy. The contrast between Sweden and Britain in these respects impels him to consider the underlying causes of the j difference and he comes to the con- | elusion that the chief reason is the j neglect to which farming land lias been | subjected in Britain during the past hundred years. “Drains made by prodigious labour have been left to silt up, so that pasture becomes swamp again; fences needing patient care season by season are left to grow rank and useless: then as crons diminish and prices fall and labour becomes s'nrce, gales, outhouses, even dwellings, are left to decay. These are the signs of relapse and deterioration that over large areas mark the British countryside. But they are not to be seen in Sweden, and Professor Findlay finds the ultimate cause in the Industrial Devolution which transformed Britain so completely in the eighteenth and nineteenth 'centuries. This transfer of the national capital i

and labour from the primary to the secondary industries was accomplished m Britain with remarkable rapidity and completeness. “When our greatgrandfathers found themselves suddenly getting ri.li with the aid of coal and steam and factories, they lost their sense of balance,” and ttie result was the growth of the densely congested factory towns, the depopulation of the rural districts and the relative neglect o the. rural industries. And so to-day we .witness the decay of agriculture, the devastation of the farm, lands and the retrogression of the whole country towards that primitive and relatively unproductive condition from which it had been raised by many centuries of patient toil. It is possible that Professor Findlay’s diagnosis ol the state of the rural industries in Britain is too pessimistic, but there is obvious Wisdom, in his warnings. He tells us that “capital in agriculture only accrues, from the long-drawn, slow increment of the years and centuries, when sun. and rain and human skill have done their work.” He reminds us that the wisest poli-y in any form or productive enterprise is “to put back into the business all that you can spare”’ and'he assures us, with the force of solemn' convi-tion, that “until the capitalist!; and manufacturer learn to put back into the soil of England the nourishment in capital and human energy that they ihave withdrawn therefrom they will continue to destroy the English stock at its roots.”, The conclusion may seem a little overdrawn, but no one can doubt the need for continuous care in the cultivation of the, land, and for .ne systematic maintenance and periodic restoration of its productive capacity by every means within the cultivator’s power. This is so plainly manifest that it needs no discussion, and the advice,.that Professor.• Findlay lias offered tp the people of, England to prevent the soil from relapsing into sterility and impotence should- appeal strongly to, the,, man “on the .land’’ in New Zealand; to-day. t ;. .q ;

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19300510.2.21

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 10 May 1930, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
709

The Guardian And Evening Star, with which is incorporated the West Coast Times. SATURDAY, MAY 10, 1930. WHEN LAND “GOES BACK.” Hokitika Guardian, 10 May 1930, Page 4

The Guardian And Evening Star, with which is incorporated the West Coast Times. SATURDAY, MAY 10, 1930. WHEN LAND “GOES BACK.” Hokitika Guardian, 10 May 1930, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert