Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DAMAGES CLAIMED

MALICIOUS STATEMENTS IN LETTER.

INVERCARGILL, February 13,

Damages to the amount of LiOJ were claimed uy Herbert Campbell, ol \Vaikawa, farmer in an action against Robert Hamilton senior, of Waikawa, farmer, in the Magistrate's Court today. • Plaintiff claimed that on April 26th 1925), defendant falsely and; malicious ly wrote and published in a letter to L>a\ id MelXmgall, M.P. these words: ‘‘l also object to this Mr Campbell as a neighbour ,as it is not. long since lie, came put of ,the asylum and is a. dangerous follow when annoyed.” Defendant, it was claimed, meant thereby that plaintiff was a man of unsound mind on occasion, who committed acts of violence towards his neighbours and was a menace to the community. Hy reason of this statement

. bdntiff’s reputation, it was alleged had been injured. Mr Hall Jones, Tor plaintiff, stated the facts of the case- and said that Campbell was a well-respected man, a returned soldier wVio bad suffered wounds and'bad the misfortune to. •ev/n/.l' unnie timp •in the mental hospital.: The grounds for Ills act arose when .he .was.applying for. a section o.i. band.. He had, then been free .of.mental trouble for several years and tli .statement, it, wn.s,claimed., was :ipade with -slanderous .intent to. prejudice hjs chances.

• -. defence raised the plea of qualified privilege. .... ; ■ In giving his decision tire Magistrate; -said the statements were undoubtedly -.libellous per se. The suggestion that plaintiff was a dangerous fellow was a very Unhappy and serious one to make, it had been proved conclusively that plaintiff was a lawnhiding citizen, who was held in * :l > highest respect by all who knew him Even had he found that qualified privi lege existed it would have been •overridden by the malice evidenced by defendant. ' Magistrate fixed da maces a* £35, with costs against defendant.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19300217.2.26

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 17 February 1930, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
302

DAMAGES CLAIMED Hokitika Guardian, 17 February 1930, Page 3

DAMAGES CLAIMED Hokitika Guardian, 17 February 1930, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert