Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

AN ACQUITTAL,

(By Telegraph—Press Association).

WELLINGTON, Feb. 4

At the Supreme Court, R. B. Garney was aequited on a charge of caUnal knowledge 'and indecent assault. The jury considered the department, in whose, charge the girl was, lax in not having her examined.

Justice Reed remarked he did not agree with them and doubted if there was any material entitling them to come to such a decision.

PAMERiSTON X., Feb. 4

The Supreme Court opened this morning before Justice Ostler, who congratulated the district on the almost complete absence of serious crime. In his charge to the Grand Jury, he said, in addition to a prisoner for sentence .there was only one case for trial, of allegedly obtaining a small sum by false pretences, which could quite well have been dealt with in the Magistrate’s Court. The Grand Jury, in returning a true bill, expressed the opinion that it was an unnecessary expense, having the case dealt with by the Supreme Court. His Honour agreed that it was a pity the time of so many people must Ive wasted, instead of the case being dealt with by Justices in the Lower Court. TIMARU, Feb. 4. The Supreme Court opened to-day before .Justice Adams. There are three cases for adjudication—alleged murder, alleged negligent driving, and alleged indecent assault. Addressing the Grand Jury. His Honour expressed regret at the three charges. Referring to the charge of murder against Jack Oldfield, His Honour said it appeared that accused was at the war. where he was wounded in the head and leg. After referring to domestic matters during the intervals between return from

the war and the alleged commission of the crime, His Honour made reference to the murder, relating the evidence given at the preliminary trial and said that the Grand Jury should have no difficulty in dealing with the ease. Referring to the second case of alleged negligent driving His Honour said that the outcome of the collision was a fatal accident, the charge being brought under the Motor Vehicles Act which made it a punishable crime if a person drove a motor car negligently, thereby causing the death of a human being. Here again the Grand Jury should experience no difficulty in arriving at a bill. In this case the jury returned a true bill after a short retirement. It is understood the Oldfield case will be heard to-morrow.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19300204.2.44

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 4 February 1930, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
400

SUPREME COURT Hokitika Guardian, 4 February 1930, Page 5

SUPREME COURT Hokitika Guardian, 4 February 1930, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert