Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PERJURY CHARGES

»By Telegraph-—Per Press'Association.) INVEBOARIGILL, October 23. In the Polict Court this morning. Patrick O’Donnell was charged with committing perjury on June I.2th, at Invercargill in certain judicial proceedings. By reason of .the fact that W. H. Woodward, S.M., before whom the case, out of which the charge, arose was heard, was called by the police nr a witness, it was found necessary to bring the case before two Justices of the Peace and Messrs A. W. Jones and M. Miller occupied the benchi The exact wording of the information charged defendant with committing perjury by falsely swearing as follows, or to the following effect: “I am quite certain my car was not out of the garage on the night of April 12th., 1929. My son Joseph was not out of the house that night. Neither he nor the car was in Invercargill that night.” This was alleged to have been said during the hearing of a charge against Joseph O’Donnell, son of accused, of driving a motor car by night without , a tail light.

Senior Sergeant Fox outlined the course of the whole proceedings, and declrred the steps leading up to tlie prosecution on June 12th. Both accused and his son appeared before the Magistrate, and as a result of their evdience the case had been dismissed. As a result of further information received, the police reopened the case on July 26th. A conviction had been entered. The whole matter had been referred to Wellington and the Solicitor General’s permission was obtained to nmseoute both accused and his son. Mr Eustace Bussell, who appeared for the accused, mentioned that in view of the evidence which had been called at the rehearing, he had advised the accused to plead guilty, and on the second occasion he had not appeared in the box.' At the conclusion of the evidence IV,r the prosecution, accused’s counsel intimated that the accused had nothing to say. Accused was committed to the Supreme Court for trial, and lie reserved his defence. Bail was fixed at £ICO. A similar charge was preferred against Joseph O’Donnell, who was also committed for trial.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19291024.2.19

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 24 October 1929, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
355

PERJURY CHARGES Hokitika Guardian, 24 October 1929, Page 3

PERJURY CHARGES Hokitika Guardian, 24 October 1929, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert